Fast response to – why was Gandhi unhappy with the lawyers?

Gandhi harbored discontent towards the legal practitioners as he perceived them as agents upholding an inequitable legal framework that unduly favored the affluent and influential, while disregarding the plight of the masses. Perceiving the legal fraternity as an enabler of social disparity, he embarked on a mission to question and combat this system, employing the weapons of nonviolence.

For further information, read more

Gandhi’s disillusionment with lawyers sprang from his conviction that they upheld an unjust legal framework that favored the privileged elite while disregarding the plight of the masses. In Gandhi’s eyes, the legal fraternity played an active role in perpetuating a system that exacerbated social inequalities, compelling him to courageously defy and combat this disparity through peaceful methods.

One of the main reasons for Gandhi’s dissatisfaction was the view that lawyers represented the interests of the rich and powerful while often ignoring the plight of marginalized segments of society. He felt that he had lost sight of the true purpose of the legal profession, which, according to him, was to serve as an instrument for justice and equality. Gandhi once said, “The real role of the lawyer is to bring the disjointed parties together.”

In the eyes of Gandhi, the principles of accessibility, fairness, and impartiality were intrinsic to the essence of the law, as they safeguarded the welfare of every individual, irrespective of their societal status. Yet, he perceived the actual legal framework as a tool of subjugation and prejudice. This, in his view, constituted a profound defect impeding the advancement of society toward a more righteous and egalitarian state.

In response to these apprehensions, Gandhi undertook a noble quest to defy the establishment and advance societal transformation. He ardently championed the application of nonviolent resistance, civil disobedience, and tranquil demonstrations as a means to unveil the inequities perpetuated by the legal structure. Gandhi’s objective was to ignite consciousness and galvanize the populace in their battle against prevailing social inequalities, while aspiring for a harmonious and fair society.

Interesting facts about Gandhi’s perception of lawyers:

  1. Despite his criticism of the legal profession, Gandhi initially aspired to become a lawyer himself and studied law in London.

  2. Gandhi’s understanding of the law played a significant role in shaping his philosophy of nonviolence and civil disobedience, as he refused to abide by laws that he deemed unjust.

  3. In his autobiography “The Story of My Experiments with Truth,” Gandhi reflects on his journey of disillusionment with the legal profession and his realization that the pursuit of justice lies beyond the confines of the courtroom.

  4. Gandhi’s critique of lawyers was not limited to India. He believed that lawyers worldwide should recognize the societal impact of their work and strive for a more equitable legal system.

IT IS INTERESTING:  What is social advocacy and how can it bring change to a society?

The following table illustrates some key differences in Gandhi’s perception of lawyers:

Traditional Role of Lawyers Gandhi’s Perspective
Upholding the law and representing clients’ interests Agents perpetuating an inequitable legal framework
Focusing on legal technicalities Neglecting the needs of the masses
Individualistic approach Inability to unite parties and create harmony
Serving the privileged and wealthy Disregarding the marginalized and underprivileged

In summary, Gandhi’s dissatisfaction with lawyers stemmed from his belief that they played a significant role in upholding an unjust legal system that favored the affluent at the expense of the less fortunate. He sought to challenge this system through nonviolent means, aiming to bring about a more just and equitable society. Gandhi’s critique of lawyers highlights his profound understanding of the impact of the legal profession on social dynamics and the need for lawyers to prioritize justice above all else.

I discovered more solutions online

Gandhiji chided the lawyers for over-charging the poor peasants. When the peasants were so poor and crushed, it was inhuman to charge heavy fees from them. Gandhiji’s selfless service and devotion to the cause of the peasants put the lawyers to shame.

Gandhi chided the lawyers for collecting big fee from the poor
sharecroppers. He thought that taking such cases to the court did little
good to the crushed and fear – stricken peasants. The relief for them,
according to Gandhi, was to be free from fear.

See the answer to your question in this video

The video discusses the controversial aspects of Mahatma Gandhi, including his views on race and sex. It also covers his role in the Indian independence movement and his later work on behalf of the poor. The video ends with a quote from Gandhi criticizing those who chose to resist violence instead of using nonviolent methods.

IT IS INTERESTING:  You asked for - does defense attorney need to be capitalized?

You will most likely be interested in these things as well

Why was Gandhi unhappy with the lawyers in Muzaffarpur?
The answer is: Gandhiji was unhappy with the lawyers in Muzzafarpur as they were collecting a huge fee from the peasants. He was against taking the case to the law courts as he knew the fear stricken peasants would be further crushed and exploited in the court. Gandhiji wanted to free the farmers from the fear of Britishers.
Why did Gandhi become a lawyer?
As a response to this: The naked purpose of providing young Gandhi a legal education was to guarantee an income for the family. It is not surprising, then, that when Gandhi was asked in 1891 why he had come to England to study the law, his forthright reply was "ambition."
Was Gandhi a lawyer in South Africa?
Answer: It was only when the hand of destiny guided his steps to South Africa that he soon made his mark there as a lawyer and as a public worker. Gandhiji practised as a lawyer for over twenty years before he gave up the practice of the profession in order to devote all his time and energy to public service.
Why did Gandhiji go to Champaran?
Gandhiji visited Champaran in Bihar to inspire the peasants to struggle against oppressive .
What did Gandhi say about law?
Motiwal (1970) states that Gandhi once remarked: “Facts mean truth, and once we [lawyers] adhere to truth, the law comes to our aid naturally”, while reflecting on his experiences as a lawyer in South Africa after returning to India.
Did Mahatma Gandhi lose faith in law?
As an answer to this: “Gandhi eventually lost faith in the traditional legal system – courts, judges, lawyers, litigation – but he never lost faith in the law,” DiSalvo says in his study of Gandhi’s legal career. Gandhi in his writings and public speeches remained a bitter critic of Indian courts and lawyers.
Why did Gandhi Slam lawyers?
“The duty of a lawyer is always to place before the judges, and to help them to arrive at, the truth, never to prove the guilty as innocent.” As far back as 1909, Gandhi had slammed lawyers in his book, Hind Swaraj or Indian Home Rule, for encouraging litigations and prolonging them. He stressed on lawyers to promote reconciliation.
How did Mahatma Gandhi become a barrister?
The answer is: 1. Mahatma Gandhi sailed for England on 4th September, 1888 to study law and become a barrister. He kept terms at the Inner Temple and after nine months’ intensive study he took all his subjects in one examination which he passed. He was called to the Bar on 10th June, 1891 and was enrolled in the High Court of England the next day.
How did Mahatma Gandhi become a lawyer?
After his return to India, Mahatma Gandhi started a practice as a lawyer in Bombay. Here, he took up his first case, representing a client by the name Mamibai and charging 30 rupees as his fee. It was a minor case which marked Gandhiji’s debut in the Small Causes Court.
Did Mahatma Gandhi lose faith in law?
“Gandhi eventually lost faith in the traditional legal system – courts, judges, lawyers, litigation – but he never lost faith in the law,” DiSalvo says in his study of Gandhi’s legal career. Gandhi in his writings and public speeches remained a bitter critic of Indian courts and lawyers.
Did lawyers renounce Gandhi's call to resign?
Only a very small number of lawyers gave up their practices and several were overtly hostile to Gandhi’s call to renounce their profession. Congress’s own post-mortem of the effort deemed the courts’ boycott a failure.
Did Gandhi anticipate Patiala House breed of lawyers?
But even Gandhi had not anticipated Patiala House breed of lawyers. Lawyers carry a Tricolour as they march from Patiala House Courts to India Gate against alleged anti-national activities at JNU. PTI Photo by Atul Yadav Continued support of Lingayats is critical for the incumbent BJP to retain power in the Karnataka assembly elections in 2023.

Rate article
Advocacy and jurisprudence