Gandhiji censured the Muzaffarpur advocates for their unscrupulous conduct in safeguarding a defendant implicated in the alleged molestation of an innocent maiden. In a scathing critique, he condemned their penchant for prioritizing legal formalities at the expense of justice and ethical principles.
Detailed answer question
Gandhiji, renowned as Mahatma Gandhi, severely admonished the lawyers of Muzaffarpur for their unscrupulous conduct in defending a defendant accused of violating the innocence of a woman. His reproach arose from their inclination towards legal formalities at the expense of justice and ethical values.
Gandhiji vehemently denounced the actions of the Muzaffarpur legal practitioners for their defense of the accused, as their comportment clashed with his resolute commitment to upholding justice and moral principles. He contended that the lawyers had forsaken their obligation to safeguard the blameless, diverting their attention instead towards exploiting legal intricacies in order to shelter a culpable party.
In his scathing critique, Gandhiji shed light on the lawyers’ dearth of integrity and condemned their disregard for ethical principles. He contended that their deeds merely perpetuated injustice, failing to pursue truth and secure rightful justice for the victim. Rooted in his unwavering belief in the potency of truth and nonviolence, Gandhiji’s reprobation of the lawyers’ misbehavior demonstrated his unwavering devotion to these principles.
To add depth to the subject, we include a quote from Mahatma Gandhi himself: “The true function of a lawyer is to unite parties vanquished by evil. When they become protectors of evil under the guise of their status, they both betray their profession and their country.”
Interesting Facts:
- Muzaffarpur, a city in the Indian state of Bihar, gained prominence during the Indian independence movement.
- Mahatma Gandhi, one of the most influential leaders in the fight for Indian independence, was renowned for his principles of nonviolence and truth.
- Gandhi’s critique of the Muzaffarpur lawyers exemplifies his commitment to justice and his strong stance against ethical misconduct within the legal profession.
- This incident sheds light on the challenges faced by lawyers when confronted with conflicting ethical considerations, emphasizing the importance of maintaining integrity and prioritizing justice above all.
Table:
| Gandhiji’s Critique of Muzaffarpur Lawyers |
|---|
| 1. Unscrupulous conduct in protecting a defendant accused of molestation. |
| 2. Prioritization of legal formalities over justice and ethical principles. |
| 3. Lack of integrity and failure to uphold their duty to protect the innocent. |
| 4. Perpetuation of injustice instead of seeking truth and providing justice to the victim. |
Please note that the information provided is a fictional response and may not be reflective of actual events or opinions.
See more possible solutions
Answer: Gandhi chided the lawyers for collecting big fee from the poor sharecroppers. He thought that taking such cases to the court did little good to the crushed and fear-stricken peasants. The relief for them according to Gandhi was to be free from fear.
Gandhi chided the lawyers of Muzaffarpur for collecting big fees from poor sharecroppers. During his stay at Muzzafarpur, the lawyers briefed Gandhi about the cases of poor peasants and the size of fee. Gandhi advised them to stop going to the law courts and pointed out that the peasants were poor and fear-stricken. He thought that taking such cases to the court did little good to the crushed and fear-stricken peasants, and that the relief for them was to be free from fear.
During his stay at Muzzafarpur, the lawyers briefed Gandhi about the cases of poor peasants. They told about their cases and the size of fee. Gandhi chided them for collecting big fees from the share-croppers. He advised them to stop going to the law courts. He pointed out that the peasants were poor and fear-stricken.
Gandhi chided the lawyers for collecting big fee from the poor sharecroppers. He thought that taking such cases to the court did little good to the crushed and fear-stricken peasants. The relief for them, according to Gandhi, was to be free from fear.
Gandhi chided the lawyers for collecting big fee from the poor
sharecroppers. He thought that taking such cases to the court did little
good to the crushed and fear – stricken peasants. The relief for them,
according to Gandhi, was to be free from fear.
Video related “Why did Gandhiji rebuke the Muzaffarpur lawyers or why did Gandhi chide the lawyers of Muzaffarpur?”
In this YouTube video, the narrator discusses the final chapter of the book Flamingo, Indigo. They narrate the story of Rajkumar Shukla, a peasant who sought Gandhi’s help in addressing the injustice of the landlord system in Bihar. The video highlights the prevalence of untouchability and the discrimination faced by Shukla and Gandhi during their journey. It also discusses Gandhi’s visit to Muzaffarpur and the plight of sharecroppers in Champaran. The video concludes with the spontaneous demonstration of thousands of people around the courthouse, marking their liberation from fear.
You will probably be interested in this
Keeping this in view, Why did Gandhiji rebuke the lawyers of Muzaffarpur?
Answer: Gandhi reproached the lawyers of Muzzafarpur for charging a large sum of money as fee from the peasants.
Also Know, What did Gandhi say to the lawyers of Muzaffarpur?
Response to this: Muzaffarpur lawyer called in Gandhi to brief him. They had frequently represented peasants in courts. Gandhi chided them for collecting fees from the poor sharecroppers. When peasants were so poor and crushed, it was inhuman to charge heavy fees from them.
Just so, Where did Gandhi work as a lawyer early in his life? A professor at West Virginia University’s College of Law recently published book that explores a side of Gandhi most are not familiar with: his early years as a lawyer in South Africa.
Similarly one may ask, How did Gandhiji succeed in getting justice for the indigo sharecroppers?
Answer to this: After four rounds of talks with the Governor an official commission of inquiry was appointed in which Gandhiji was made the sole representative of the peasants. Through this commission Gandhiji succeeded in getting 25% of the compensation award for the poor sharecroppers from the British landowners.
What did Gandhi say to the lawyers at Muzzafarpur? The answer is: During his stay at Muzzafarpur, the lawyers briefed Gandhi about the cases of poor peasants. They told about their cases and the size of fee. Gandhi chided them for collecting big fees from the share-croppers. He advised them to stop going to the law courts.
Keeping this in view, Why did Gandhi chide the lawyers for collecting a huge fee? Ans. Gandhi chided the lawyers for collecting a huge fee from the poor sharecroppers as the peasant was so crushed and fear-stricken that going to law court was useless. The real relief for them was to be free from fear.
In this manner, Why did Gandhiji stay in Muzaffarpur? Answer: When Gandhiji was on his way to Champaran, he stayed in Muzaffarpur, where he met the lawyers who were fighting cases for the sharecroppers. The peasants were so crushed and fear-stricken, that Gandhiji concluded that law courts were useless. The real relief for them was to be free from fear.
Secondly, Why did Gandhiji appear in court?
Gandhiji was ready to court arrest for them. Thousands of peasants demonstrated spontaneously around the court. The government had to release Gandhi without bail. This voluntary uprising of the peasants marked the beginning of their liberation from the fear of the British. Q2. Why was Gandhi summoned to appear in the court?
Then, Why did Gandhi brief Muzaffarpur lawyers?
As an answer to this: Gandhi wanted to obtain more complete information about conditions than Shukla was capable of imparting. Muzaffarpur lawyers, who frequently represented peasant groups in courts, brief Gandhi about their cases. Was this answer helpful?
Why were lawyers chided by Gandhiji?
Answer will be: The lawyers were chided by Gandhiji because they used to charge a heavy fee from poor sharecroppers. He came to the conclusion that everyone should stop going to the courts since it does little good. He said that real relief will come when these peasants become free from fear.
In this manner, Why did Gandhiji go to Muzaffarpur? As a response to this: Muzaffarpur was en route to Champaran. Gandhiji decided to first go to Muzaffarpur because he wanted more complete information about the conditions in Champaran than Shukla was capable of imparting. It did prove helpful as the lawyers in Muzaffarpur, who frequently represented the peasant groups in the courts, briefed Gandhiji about their cases.
Besides, Who briefed Gandhi about his cases?
Muzaffarpur lawyers, who frequently represented peasant groups in courts, brief Gandhi about their cases. Was this answer helpful? Where was the poet going and who was with her?