The compulsion to don a wig is not obligatory for barristers. Although wigs have historically been a staple of court attire, their usage is now discretionary in numerous jurisdictions, reserved solely for specific events.
Comprehensive answer to the question
The donning of wigs by barristers is not obligatory, albeit an age-old customary practice in numerous legal systems. In contemporary times, the utilization of wigs has grown discretionary in diverse jurisdictions and is frequently reserved for particular occasions within the legal vocation.
Curiously, the ancient lineage of wigs within the legal realm extends across the annals of time. Originally donned by esteemed judges and learned barristers, these headpieces served as a testament to their elevated standing and acumen, effectively demarcating their private persona from their public vocation. Gradually, this sartorial custom pervaded numerous nations, even those that had once been under the dominion of the British Empire, such as Australia and South Africa.
In recent times, a perceptible transformation has occurred in the perception of wigs within the realm of legal proceedings. Numerous jurisdictions have veered away from the imperative of donning wigs, deeming them archaic and superfluous. This alteration is frequently ascribed to the aspiration of contemporizing the legal system and rendering it more approachable and resonant with the general populace.
A notable example is the UK Supreme Court, where the traditional practice of wearing wigs was abolished in 2008. Lord Phillips, then Chief Justice of the UK, stated, “It is time to recognize that wigs and gowns are not essential to our justice system “.
Here are some interesting facts about wigs in the legal profession:
- The custom of wearing wigs in court can be traced back to the 17th century, when they were a fashionable accessory in English society.
- Wig-making became a lucrative profession during the 18th century, with specialized craftsmen known as “peruke-makers” creating intricate and elaborate wigs for judges and barristers.
- Wigs are typically made from horsehair, which is carefully styled and powdered to achieve a distinctive white or gray color.
- The length and style of wigs can indicate the rank and seniority of a barrister or judge. For example, more senior barristers often wear longer wigs with curls.
- The tradition of wearing wigs has not completely disappeared, and some judges and lawyers still choose to wear wigs on certain occasions, such as during ceremonial events or when appearing in higher courts.
To provide a visual representation of the diversity and styles of wigs historically worn by legal professionals, here’s a table showcasing a few examples:
| Style of Wig | Description |
|---|---|
| Full-bottom wig | A long, curly wig that covers the shoulders and extends down the back |
| Tie wig | A shorter wig tied at the nape of the neck, often with a bow |
| Bob wig | A shorter wig with straight hair, typically worn by junior barristers |
| Judicial wig | A smaller, more restrained wig worn by judges |
In conclusion, while the wearing of wigs is no longer mandatory for barristers and judges, it remains a symbol of tradition and formality in some legal systems. The discretionary usage of wigs reflects the changing attitudes towards courtroom attire, as legal professionals strive to balance tradition with modernity in their practice of justice.
Here are some more answers to your question
In several nations, female barristers do wear wigs.In the United Kingdom, male and female barristers are required to wear wigs in court proceedings. However, in the United States and other countries, wigs are generally only worn by male judges.
There are a number of reasons why barristers still wear wigs: it brings a sense of formality and solemnity to proceedings. by wearing a gown and wig, a barrister represents the rich history of common law and the supremacy of the law over the proceedings. wearing a wig allows a visual separation between the law and those before it.
The wig and gown are collectively the official stamp of that special legal responsibility that distinguishes the individual as a barrister, regardless of practice area.
Wigs are so much a part of British criminal courts that if a barrister doesn’t wear one, it’s seen as an insult to the court.
Wearing wigs in the courtroom was an attempt to add to the prestige of the court and differ the wearers from those who approached the law. Barristers and judges in the UK, unlike those in the rest of the world, have gone one step beyond the black robe and white collar by regularly wearing wigs.
Video response
This video explores the rich tradition and cultural importance of legal wigs in British courts. The wigs, made by the oldest taylors in London, have been part of the legal profession for over 300 years. They not only maintain the solemnity and tradition of court proceedings but also serve as a symbol of experience and readiness for barristers. Made from horse hair and available in various colors, these wigs symbolize the years of hard work and are seen as a rite of passage in the legal profession.